Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Journal of Cardiovascular MR and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Abstracts of the 2011 SCMR/Euro CMR Joint Scientific Sessions

Open Access Oral presentation

Arterial spin labeled MRI detects clinically relevant increases in myocardial blood flow with vasodilatation

Zungho Zun1*, Padmini Varadarajan2, Ramdas G Pai2, Eric C Wong3 and Krishna S Nayak1

  • * Corresponding author: Zungho Zun

Author Affiliations

1 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2 Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA

3 University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011, 13(Suppl 1):O94  doi:10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-O94


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://jcmr-online.com/content/13/S1/O94


Published:2 February 2011

© 2011 Zun et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Objective

This study sought to demonstrate the potential for arterial spin labeling (ASL) to differentiate normal and ischemic myocardial segments based on increase in myocardial blood flow (MBF) with vasodilatation.

Background

Myocardial ASL is a promising technique for the assessment of MBF because of the absence of contrast agents. Patients with end-stage renal disease cannot tolerate contrast agent, and therefore stand to potential benefit from myocardial ASL. MBF in healthy myocardium is known to increase by 4 times during vasodilator-induced stress, compared to at rest [1].

Methods

Twenty nine patients were recruited from those scheduled for routine cardiac MR (CMR) exams. All MRI experiments were performed on a GE Signa 3T scanner. Myocardial ASL measurements were obtained from a single mid short-axis slice, using flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) tagging and balanced steady-state free precession (SSFP) imaging [2]. Rest-stress myocardial ASL scans were incorporated in CMR exam including first-pass imaging during adenosine infusion of 0.14 mg/kg/min (Figure 1). Based on CMR results, patients who were suspected to have severe ischemic heart disease also underwent X-ray angiography.

thumbnailFigure 1. Imaging protocol excerpt.

Results

Among 29 patients, fifteen patients were found to be normal based on having no visible perfusion defect on first-pass MRI and no significant stenosis on X-ray angiogram. Ten patients had both perfusion defects and stenosis. Four remaining patients showed perfusion defects but no stenosis. Table 1 summarizes the perfusion analysis performed in both whole myocardium and myocardial segments after excluding subjects with signal-to-physiological-noise ratio<2.0 [2]. The normal segments included all six segments [3] of the whole myocardium in normal patients and ischemic segments included the most ischemic segments in the patients with stenosis confirmed by X-ray angiography. MBF increase with adenosine in the global and segmental myocardium in normal patients were both statistically significant with p<0.0001 while MBF increase with adenosine in ischemic segments were not statistically significant with p=0.1032, based on paired t-test. Difference in perfusion reserve (MBFstress/MBFrest) between normal and ischemic segments was statistically significant with p=0.0296, based on unpaired t-test.

Table 1. MBF at rest and during stress (ml/g/min) and perfusion reserve.

Conclusion

This study has demonstrated that myocardial ASL is able to capture adenosine-induced MBF increase in normal myocardium while detecting insignificant increase in ischemic myocardium. This suggests that myocardial ASL with vasodilation has a potential to diagnose angiographically significant heart disease.

References

  1. Kaufmann , et al.:

    Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Zun , et al.:

    MRM. 2009. OpenURL

  3. Cerqueira , et al.:

    Circulation. 2002. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL