Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Journal of Cardiovascular MR and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Abstracts of the 2011 SCMR/Euro CMR Joint Scientific Sessions

Open Access Open Badges Poster presentation

A protocol for the measurement of myocardial blood volume and water exchange

Octavia Biris*, Neil Chatterjee and James Carr

  • * Corresponding author: Octavia Biris

Author Affiliations

Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2011, 13(Suppl 1):P140  doi:10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P140

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at:

Published:2 February 2011

© 2011 Biris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Absolute myocardial perfusion MR imaging (ml/min/100g tissue) has the potential to timely diagnose and reduce patient mortality from coronary artery disease.


Organ perfusion can be quantified by direct calibration of relative perfusion images using absolute blood volume (ml/100g) [1]. It is well known that for an intravascular gadolinium-based T1 shortening contrast agent, the parenchymal T1 change reflects tissue blood volume [2].However, to accurately quantify blood flow from blood volume, we must describe the compartmentalization effects of intra- to extra-vascular water exchange [2,3].

Materials and methods


In an instrumented dog we measured T1 using a cardiac gated Modified Look Locker Inversion Recovery (MOLLI)(4) pulse sequence (slice thickness 8 mm, FOV 171 x 343 mm2, matrix 96 x192, TR 173 ms, effective TI 100 ms ). Images were acquired on a 1.5 T Espree scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany), during a short breath-hold, 5 minutes after injections of 0.003 mmol/kg of MS-325 (Ablavar, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Billerica, MA).

Image processing

We estimated the myocardium and left ventricle blood pool T1 through fitting of MOLLI signal to the regrowth curves of the Look-Locker equation by an automatic image processing program developed in MATLAB R2009a (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA).Myocardial blood volume (MBV) was calculated from the baseline to post-contrast change in T1 in the blood pool and myocardium.


Low dose injections (1/10th of single dose for humans) of MS-325 effected significant changes in myocardial T1’s (Table 1). The measured MBV was 40% of total myocardial volume, or 28 ml/100g, a value that over-estimates those quoted in the literature [5]. Water exchange in the myocardium was shown to approach the slow or no-exchange limit (Figure 1).

Table 1. Blood pool and myocardium T1

thumbnailFigure 1. Vascular fractions fv predictions based on “No exchange” and fast exchange limits for a range of exchange values (left). Preliminary results from our experiments suggest the “No exchange” limit is appropriate for the quantification of myocardial blood volume (right).


We have established an imaging protocol to measure MBV and water exchange. Over-estimation of MBV may be caused by extravasation of MS-325, and to a lesser extent by T2 bias on the T1 measurements with the steady-state free precession MOLLI sequence. Future steps include measuring MBV with a strictly intravascular USPIO contrast agent, application of a more sophisticated fit that includes T2 effects, and determination of the water exchange constant by Monte-Carlo simulations.


  1. Carroll TJ, Horowitz S, et al.:

    Magn Reson Imaging. 2008, 26(10):1352-9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  2. Donahue KM, Weisskoff RM, et al.:

    Magn Reson Med. 1996, 36(6):858-67. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Hazlewood CF, Chang DC, et al.:

    Biophys J. 1974, 14(8):583-606. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Messroghli DR, Radjenovic A, et al.:

    Magn Reson Med. 2004, 52(1):141-6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Bjornerud A, Bjerner T, et al.:

    Magn Reson Med. 2003, 49(5):828-37. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL