- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Quantification of left ventricular deformation fields from undersampled radial, real-time cardiac MRI
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 16, Article number: P366 (2014)
Background
Regional ventricular elasticity is altered in ischemic heart disease and LV hypertrophy, potentially contributing to and sustaining a ventricular remodeling process. Conventional methods to measure regional ventricular elasticity in preclinical animal models require high fidelity ventricular pressure measurement, sonomicrometry transducers and dynamic modulation of preload. These procedures are highly invasive and provide only limited regional information; patient studies are prohibitive. We dynamically measure global LV elastance using undersampled radial real-time MRI and seek to find regional LV elastance in these studies. This requires tracking LV motion derived from wall thickness measurements in a large number of real-time image frames at high accuracy. We assessed several motion tracking algorithms and characterize their fidelity with respect to true motion labeled by experts and sensitivity to residual radial streak artifact.
Methods
A series of short axis MR slices were acquired in 9 patients using a golden-angle radial bSSFP trajectory (total views = 4000, radial views per image = 34, shared profiles = 31, reconstructed frame rate = 98 fps) and reconstructed via conjugate gradient-SENSE based iterative reconstruction. Two independent researchers manually segmented the datasets and the movies were restricted to three full heartbeats to limit the number of images. Image registrations were performed between the initial end-diastolic frame and all subsequent frames. The image registrations were performed using b-spline and symmetric diffeomorphic (SyN) image registration across a range of spatial scales (shown in Table 1). Four separate image registration metrics were investigated (mutual information, mean-squared overlap, cross-correlation, and demons). Although we expected mean squares and cross-correlation to perform better in this intramodality registration, radial streaking could potentially corrupt data integrity. The resulting deformation fields were evaluated using an array of metrics (dice coefficient, area overlap, false positive, and false negative rate) for all registrations, image frames and patients.
Results
The results obtained using 70 different registrations on 9 patients illustrate symmetric diffeomorphic registrations outperformed b-spine, an intermediate spatial scale of 13.75 mm × 13.75 mm outperformed larger and smaller grids, and the larger step-size (1.0) improved results relative to the smaller step size (0.1). We believe the ideal spatial scale is a tradeoff between sufficient resolution to capture the cardiac motion and avoiding local minimums. In terms of metrics, smaller changes in the results were observed but the mean squares resulted in the best overall result.
Conclusions
Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration of moderate spatial scale allows for accurate tracking of myocardial motion and estimation of wall thickness from a large number of real-time image frames.
Funding
K99-HL108157, R01-HL103723, T32HL007954, T32-EB009384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Contijoch, F., Rogers, K., Avants, B. et al. Quantification of left ventricular deformation fields from undersampled radial, real-time cardiac MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16 (Suppl 1), P366 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-P366
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-P366