Skip to main content
  • Oral presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Infarct burden following multivessel PCI vs. infarct-only PCI in patients with acute STEMI: the Glasgow PRAMI CMR sub-study

Background

In the Preventive Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trial (PRAMI; ISRCTN73028481), immediate multivessel PCI (MV-PCI) of non-IRA (infarct related artery) lesions in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease (MVD) improved long term prognosis. We assessed infarct distribution and size in a pre-specified cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) sub-study.

Methods

In this single centre prospective sub-study, PRAMI participants were invited to undergo 1.5 Tesla CMR 1 week and 1 year after primary PCI. The CMR scans were analysed using semi-automated software by a clinician blinded to treatment group assignment and clinical outcomes. The presence and extent of infarction were assessed quantitatively with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging (Gadovist, 0.1 mmol/kg). The infarct was delineated as an area of myocardial enhancement (cm2) using a signal intensity threshold of >5SDs above a remote region, and expressed as a % of total LV mass. The incidence of new LGE in non-infarct related artery territories at baseline and 1 year were assessed. Data were analysed by an independent statistician.

Results

Of 465 randomised trial participants in 6 UK hospitals, 138 (30%) were enrolled in Glasgow. Of these 80 patients underwent CMR 1 week post primary PCI of whom 41 (51%) were in the multi-vessel PCI group and 39 (49%) were in the IRA-only group. At 1 year, 69 (86%) patients had a follow up CMR scan. Infarct size and distribution are described in Table 1.

Table 1 Infarct size and distribution in non-infarct artery territory in the randomised PRAMI trial participants (n=80) in Glasgow.

Conclusions

Infarct size and distribution were similar in patients treated by MV-PCI or IRA-only PCI. MV-PCI is not associated with additional MI acutely which supports the safety of this procedure in line with the benefits observed with preventive PCI in PRAMI.

Funding

Golden Jubilee National Hospital; PRAMI was funded by Barts and the London Charity.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mangion, K., Carrick, D., Payne, A.R. et al. Infarct burden following multivessel PCI vs. infarct-only PCI in patients with acute STEMI: the Glasgow PRAMI CMR sub-study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17 (Suppl 1), O9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-O9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-O9

Keywords