- Poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Motion correction facilitates the automation of cardiac ASL perfusion imaging
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 17, Article number: P51 (2015)
Background
Cardiac arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging requires subtraction of signals in tagged and control CMR images. In recent clinical studies, perfusion reserve mapping of a single short-axis slice has required laborious manual segmentation of the LV muscle [1]. Here we demonstrate that using free open source software for automatic motion correction reduces the required manual segmentation to just 4 images (2 rest, 2 stress).
Methods
Framework
Images for rest and stress acquisition are processed similarly using the procedure in Figure 1. The control and tagged image pair that has the highest correlation to other image pairs is chosen as a "reference" (Cref, Tref), and is manually segmented to generate masks (MCref, MTref). Remaining control and tagged images are then registered to their respective reference images. The resulting displacement fields are applied to the reference masks to generate masks for each image. A threshold (0.8) is applied to ensure masks are binary. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) is calculated through spatio-temporal filtering, as previously described [2]. Registrations are performed using advanced normalization tools (ANTS) [3] (settings: cross correlation; symmetric diffeomorphic transform; directly manipulated free form deformation regularization).
Validation
The proposed method was applied retrospectively to data from a published 29-patient clinical study [1]. Accuracy of masks and intra-operator variability of manual segmentation was assessed using Dice Coefficient (DC) analysis (three manual segmentations of the same datasets) and used as a benchmark for peak performance. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the proposed method and compare with manual segmentation.
Results
The intra-operator DCs were 0.75, 0.77, 0.77, and manual vs. automatic DCs were 0.70, 0.75, 0.75. This suggests that the performance of automated segmentation was comparable to the repeatability of manual segmentations. The relatively low DC values are likely due to the low resolution of the datasets; the LV region of interest is just 2-4 pixels thick. Figure 2a contains a representative example. The ROC area under the curve (AUC) for per-patient detection of angiographically significant CAD was 0.87 and 0.92 for the manual and automated approach, as shown in Figure 2b.The AUC for the automated approach shows that it has comparable diagnostic accuracy to the manual approach.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that motion correction reduces the need for laborious manual segmentation in myocardial ASL from 24/36 images to 4 images, and can be performed using free open source software. Motion correction improves the workflow for myocardial ASL, and may enable new experiment designs that rely on longer data collection, such as continuous monitoring of blood flow during application of stress or during intervention.
Funding
American Heart Association; Wallace H. Coulter Foundation.
References
Zun Z: JACC. 2011
Jao T: ISMRM. 2011
Avants B: Insight J. 2009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Javed, A., Jao, T.R. & Nayak, K.S. Motion correction facilitates the automation of cardiac ASL perfusion imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17 (Suppl 1), P51 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P51
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-P51