<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.jcmr-online.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</description>
        <dc:date>2013-05-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/41" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/40" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/39" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/38" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/37" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/36" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/35" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/34" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/33" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/32" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/41">
        <title>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance artefacts</title>
        <description>The multitude of applications offered by CMR make it an increasing popular modality to study the heart and the surrounding vessels. Nevertheless the anatomical complexity of the chest, together with cardiac and respiratory motion, and the fast flowing blood, present many challenges which can possibly translate into imaging artefacts. The literature is wide in terms of papers describing specific MR artefacts in great technical detail. In this review we attempt to summarise, in a language accessible to a clinical readership, some of the most common artefacts found in CMR applications. It begins with an introduction of the most common pulse sequences, and imaging techniques, followed by a brief section on typical cardiovascular applications. This leads to the main section on common CMR artefacts with examples, a short description of the mechanisms behind them, and possible solutions.</description>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/41</link>
                <dc:creator>Pedro Ferreira</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Gatehouse</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raad Mohiaddin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Firmin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:41</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-41</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-41-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>41</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/40">
        <title>Preliminary experience with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluation of fetal cardiovascular anomalies</title>
        <description>Background:
The cardiovascular system is the part of the fetal anatomy that most frequently suffers from congenital pathology. This study shows our preliminary experience with fetal cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to evaluate congenital cardiovascular abnormalities.
Methods:
Between January 2006 and June 2011, Prenatal routine obstetric ultrasound (US), echocardiography and CMR data from 68 pregnant women carrying fetuses with congenital cardiovascular anomalies were compared with postnatal diagnoses (postnatal imagings, surgery and autopsy). All prenatal CMR was performed at 1.5 T. Imaging sequences included steady-state free-precession (SSFP) sequences, real-time SSFP and single-shot turbo spin echo (SSTSE) sequences. The images were analyzed with an anatomic segmental approach by two radiologists.
Results:
Fetal CMR yielded the same diagnosis as postnatal findings in 79% (54/68) of patients. The diagnostic sensitivity of routine obstetric US for cardiac anomalies was 46% (31/68). The diagnostic sensitivity of fetal echocardiographic examination by a fetal cardiac specialist was 82% (56/68). In 2 (3%) of 68 cases, diagnoses with both echocardiography and CMR were incorrect when compared with postnatal diagnosis. In ten (15%) cases, diagnosis at echocardiography was incorrect and that at CMR was correct. In twelve (18%) cases, diagnosis at echocardiography was correct and that at CMR was incorrect. Ten cases missed or misdiagnosed by echocardiography but correctly diagnosed by fetal CMR included asplenia syndrome (n = 2), interrupted inferior vena cava of polysplenia syndrome (n = 1), tricuspid incompetence (n = 1), double outlet right ventricle (n = 2), double aortic arch (n = 1), right pulmonary artery hypoplasia (n = 1), right-sided aortic arch of tetralogy of Fallot (n = 1) and hypoplastic left heart syndrome of a twin fetus (n = 1).
Conclusion:
Fetal CMR is a promising diagnostic tool for assessment of congenital cardiovascular abnormalities, especially in situations that limit echocardiography.</description>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/40</link>
                <dc:creator>Suzhen Dong</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ming Zhu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fen Li</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:40</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-40</dc:identifier>
                            <dc:title>CMR useful in detecting fetal heart defects</dc:title>
                            <dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Fetal Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance yielded the same diagnosis as postnatal findings more often that routine obstetric ultrasound, showing promise for CMR as a diagnostic tool for assessment of congenital cardiovascular abnormalities.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-40-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>40</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/39">
        <title>Left ventricular reverse remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study</title>
        <description>Background:
In patients with severe aortic stenosis, left ventricular hypertrophy is associated with increased myocardial stiffness and dysfunction linked to cardiac morbidity and mortality. We aimed at systematically investigating the degree of left ventricular mass regression and changes in left ventricular function six months after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).
Methods:
Left ventricular mass indexed to body surface area (LVMi), end diastolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVEDVi), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and stroke volume (SV) were investigated by CMR before and six months after TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis and contraindications for surgical aortic valve replacement.
Results:
Twenty-sevent patients had paired CMR at baseline and at 6-month follow-up (N=27), with a mean age of 80.7+/-5.2 years. LVMi decreased from 84.5+/-25.2 g/m2 at baseline to 69.4+/-18.4 g/m2 at six months follow-up (P&lt;0.001). LVEDVi (87.2+/-30.1 ml /m2vs 86.4+/-22.3 ml/m2; P=0.84), LVEF (61.5+/-14.5% vs 65.1+/-7.2%, P=0.08) and SV (89.2+/-22 ml vs 94.7+/-26.5 ml; P=0.25) did not change significantly.
Conclusions:
Based on CMR, significant left ventricular reverse remodeling occurs six months after TAVI.</description>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/39</link>
                <dc:creator>Alessio La Manna</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alessandra Sanfilippo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Davide Capodanno</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Antonella Salemi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alessandra Cadoni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Irene Cascone</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Gesualdo Polizzi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michele Figuera</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rosetta Pittalà</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carmelo Privitera</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Corrado Tamburino</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:39</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-39</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-39-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>39</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/38">
        <title>Treatment of heart failure in adults with thalassemia major: response in patients randomised to deferoxamine with or without deferiprone</title>
        <description>Background:
Established heart failure in thalassaemia major has a poor prognosis and optimal management remains unclear.
Methods:
A 1 year prospective study comparing deferoxamine (DFO) monotherapy or when combined with deferiprone (DFP) for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &lt;56% was conducted by the Thalassemia Clinical Research Network (TCRN). All patients received DFO at 50--60 mg/kg 12--24 hr/day sc or iv 7 times weekly, combined with either DFP 75 at mg/kg/day (combination arm) or placebo (DFO monotherapy arm). The primary endpoint was the change in LVEF by CMR.
Results:
Improvement in LVEF was significant in both study arms at 6 and 12 months (p = 0.04), normalizing ventricular function in 9/16 evaluable patients. With combination therapy, the LVEF increased from 49.9% to 55.2% (+5.3% p = 0.04; n = 10) at 6 months and to 58.3% at 12 months (+8.4% p = 0.04; n = 7). With DFO monotherapy, the LVEF increased from 52.8% to 55.7% (+2.9% p = 0.04; n = 6) at 6 months and to 56.9% at 12 months (+4.1% p = 0.04; n = 4). The LVEF trend did not reach statistical difference between study arms (p = 0.89). In 2 patients on DFO monotherapy during the study and in 1 patient on combined therapy during follow up, heart failure deteriorated fatally. The study was originally powered for 86 participants to determine a 5% difference in LVEF improvement between treatments. The study was prematurely terminated due to slow recruitment and with the achieved sample size of 20 patients there was 80% power to detect an 8.6% difference in EF, which was not demonstrated. Myocardial T2* improved in both arms (combination +1.9 +/- 1.6 ms p = 0.04; and DFO monotherapy +1.9 +/- 1.4 ms p = 0.04), but with no significant difference between treatments (p = 0.65). Liver iron (p = 0.03) and ferritin (p &lt; 0.001) both decreased significantly in only the combination group.
Conclusions:
Both treatments significantly improved LVEF and myocardial T2*. Although this is the largest and only randomized study in patients with LV decompensation, further prospective evaluation is needed to identify optimal chelation management in these high-risk patients.</description>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/38</link>
                <dc:creator>John Porter</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Wood</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nancy Olivieri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elliott Vichinsky</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ali Taher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ellis Neufeld</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Giardina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexis Thompson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Blaine Moore</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patricia Evans</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hae-Young Kim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eric Macklin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Felicia Trachtenberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:38</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-38</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-38-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>38</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/37">
        <title>Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance tagging</title>
        <description>Background:
The aim of this study is to determine the test-retest reliability of the measurement of regional myocardial function by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) tagging using spatial modulation of magnetization.
Methods:
Twenty-five participants underwent CMR tagging twice over 12 +/- 7 days. To assess the role of slice orientation on strain measurement, two healthy volunteers had a first exam, followed by image acquisition repeated with slices rotated +/-15 degrees out of true short axis, followed by a second exam in the true short axis plane. To assess the role of slice location, two healthy volunteers had whole heart tagging. The harmonic phase (HARP) method was used to analyze the tagged images. Peak midwall circumferential strain (Ecc), radial strain (Err), Lambda 1, Lambda 2, and Angle alpha were determined in basal, mid and apical slices. LV torsion, systolic and early diastolic circumferential strain and torsion rates were also determined.
Results:
LV Ecc and torsion had excellent intra-, interobserver, and inter-study intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC range, 0.7 to 0.9). Err, Lambda 1, Lambda 2 and angle had excellent intra- and interobserver ICC than inter-study ICC. Angle had least inter-study reproducibility. Torsion rates had superior intra-, interobserver, and inter-study reproducibility to strain rates. The measurements of LV Ecc were comparable in all three slices with different short axis orientations (standard deviation of mean Ecc was 0.09, 0.18 and 0.16 at basal, mid and apical slices, respectively). The mean difference in LV Ecc between slices was more pronounced in most of the basal slices compared to the rest of the heart.
Conclusions:
Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of all strain and torsion parameters was excellent. Inter-study reproducibility of CMR tagging by SPAMM varied between different parameters as described in the results above and was superior for Ecc and LV torsion. The variation in LV Ecc measurement due to altered slice orientation is negligible compared to the variation due to slice location.Trial registration: This trial is registered as NCT00005487 at National Heart, Lung and Blood institute.</description>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/37</link>
                <dc:creator>Sirisha Donekal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Seth Berkowitz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Colin Wu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eui Choi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Veronica Fernandes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raymond Yan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmed Harouni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Bluemke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joao Lima</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:37</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-37</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-37-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>37</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/36">
        <title>Quantification of left ventricular trabeculae using fractal analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a myocardial disorder characterized by excessive left ventricular (LV) trabeculae. Current methods for quantification of LV trabeculae have limitations. The aim of this study is to describe a novel technique for quantifying LV trabeculation using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and fractal geometry. Observing that trabeculae appear complex and irregular, we hypothesize that measuring the fractal dimension (FD) of the endocardial border provides a quantitative parameter that can be used to distinguish normal from abnormal trabecular patterns.
Methods:
Fractal analysis is a method of quantifying complex geometric patterns in biological structures. The resulting FD is a unitless measure index of how completely the object fills space. FD increases with increased structural complexity. LV FD was measured using a box-counting method on CMR short-axis cine stacks. Three groups were studied: LVNC (defined by Jenni criteria), n=30(age 41+/-13; men, 16); healthy whites, n=75(age, 46+/-16; men, 36); healthy blacks, n=30(age, 40+/-11; men, 15).
Results:
In healthy volunteers FD varied in a characteristic pattern from base to apex along the LV. This pattern was altered in LVNC where apical FD were abnormally elevated. In healthy volunteers, blacks had higher FD than whites in the apical third of the LV (maximal apical FD: 1.253+/-0.005 vs. 1.235+/-0.004, p&lt;0.01)(mean+/-s.e.m.). Comparing LVNC with healthy volunteers, maximal apical FD was higher in LVNC (1.392+/-0.010, p&lt;0.00001). The fractal method was more accurate and reproducible (ICC, 0.97 and 0.96 for intra and inter-observer readings) than two other CMR criteria for LVNC (Petersen and Jacquier).
Conclusions:
FD is higher in LVNC patients compared to healthy volunteers and is higher in healthy blacks than in whites. Fractal analysis provides a quantitative measure of trabeculation and has high reproducibility and accuracy for LVNC diagnosis when compared to current CMR criteria.</description>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/36</link>
                <dc:creator>Gabriella Captur</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vivek Muthurangu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Cook</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrew Flett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Robert Wilson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Barison</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Daniel Sado</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Anderson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>William McKenna</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Timothy Mohun</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Perry Elliott</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Moon</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:36</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-36</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-36-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>36</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/35">
        <title>Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post Processing</title>
        <description>With mounting data on its accuracy and prognostic value, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is becoming an increasingly important diagnostic tool with growing utility in clinical routine. Given its versatility and wide range of quantitative parameters, however, agreement on specific standards for the interpretation and post-processing of CMR studies is required to ensure consistent quality and reproducibility of CMR reports. This document addresses this need by providing consensus recommendations developed by the Task Force for Post Processing of the Society for Cardiovascular MR (SCMR). The aim of the task force is to recommend requirements and standards for image interpretation and post processing enabling qualitative and quantitative evaluation of CMR images. Furthermore, pitfalls of CMR image analysis are discussed where appropriate.</description>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/35</link>
                <dc:creator>Jeanette Schulz-Menger</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Bluemke</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jens Bremerich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Scott Flamm</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mark Fogel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Matthias Friedrich</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raymond Kim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Kramer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dudley Pennell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sven Plein</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Eike Nagel</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:35</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-35</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-35-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-05-01T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/34">
        <title>Efficient and reproducible high resolution spiral myocardial phase velocity mapping of the entire cardiac cycle</title>
        <description>Background:
Three-directional phase velocity mapping (PVM) is capable of measuring longitudinal, radial and circumferential regional myocardial velocities. Current techniques use Cartesian k-space coverage and navigator-gated high spatial and high temporal resolution acquisitions are long. In addition, prospective ECG-gating means that analysis of the full cardiac cycle is not possible. The aim of this study is to develop a high temporal and high spatial resolution PVM technique using efficient spiral k-space coverage and retrospective ECG-gating. Detailed analysis of regional motion over the entire cardiac cycle, including atrial systole for the first time using MR, is presented in 10 healthy volunteers together with a comprehensive assessment of reproducibility.
Methods:
A navigator-gated high temporal (21&#160;ms) and spatial (1.4&#8201;&#215;&#8201;1.4&#160;mm) resolution spiral PVM sequence was developed, acquiring three-directional velocities in 53 heartbeats (100% respiratory-gating efficiency). Basal, mid and apical short-axis slices were acquired in 10 healthy volunteers on two occasions. Regional and transmural early systolic, early diastolic and atrial systolic peak longitudinal, radial and circumferential velocities were measured, together with the times to those peaks (TTPs). Reproducibilities were determined as mean&#8201;&#177;&#8201;SD of the signed differences between measurements made from acquisitions performed on the two days.
Results:
All slices were acquired in all volunteers on both occasions with good image quality. The high temporal resolution allowed consistent detection of fine features of motion, while the high spatial resolution allowed the detection of statistically significant regional and transmural differences in motion. Colour plots showing the regional variations in velocity over the entire cardiac cycle enable rapid interpretation of the regional motion within any given slice. The reproducibility of peak velocities was high with the reproducibility of early systolic, early diastolic and atrial systolic peak radial velocities in the mid slice (for example) being &#8722;0.01&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.36, 0.20&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.56 and 0.14&#8201;&#177;&#8201;0.42&#160;cm/s respectively. Reproducibility of the corresponding TTP values, when normalised to a fixed systolic and diastolic length, was also high (&#8722;13.8&#8201;&#177;&#8201;27.4, 1.3&#8201;&#177;&#8201;21.3 and 3.0&#8201;&#177;&#8201;10.9&#160;ms for early systolic, early diastolic and atrial systolic respectively).
Conclusions:
Retrospectively gated spiral PVM is an efficient and reproducible method of acquiring 3-directional, high resolution velocity data throughout the entire cardiac cycle, including atrial systole.</description>
        <link>http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/34</link>
                <dc:creator>Robin Simpson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jennifer Keegan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Firmin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:34</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-34</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-34-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>34</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/33">
        <title>Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Marfan syndrome</title>
        <description>This review provides an overview of Marfan syndrome with an emphasis on cardiovascular complications and cardiovascular imaging. Both pre- and post-operative imaging is addressed with an explanation of surgical management. All relevant imaging modalities are discussed with a particular focus on cardiovascular MR.</description>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/33</link>
                <dc:creator>Helen Dormand</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Raad Mohiaddin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:33</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-33</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-33-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>33</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/32">
        <title>Fast and fully automatic calibration of frequency offset for balanced steady-state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3.0 Tesla</title>
        <description>Background:
This study proposed a fast and fully automatic calibration system to suppress the dark banding artifacts in balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) at 3.0&#160;T.
Methods:
Twenty-one healthy volunteers (18 men, 3 women; mean age 24.9&#160;years) participated in this study after providing institutionally approved consent. The optimal frequency was obtained using sweep scans of transition-band low flip-angle bSSFP (bSSFP-L), performed with three conditions: breath-hold plus electrocardiography (ECG) triggering (BH&#8201;+&#8201;ECG), breath-hold only (BH), and free breathing (FB). A real-time feedback system was implemented to allow the performing of bSSFP-L calibration scanning and conventional cine bSSFP within one breath-hold. For each scan condition, the optimal phase was estimated using 20-point and 10-point spline fitting.
Results:
Linear regression analysis indicated high correlation between the optimal phases obtained using BH and FB and those obtained using BH&#8201;+&#8201;ECG (R2&#8201;=&#8201;0.91 to 0.98, n&#8201;=&#8201;21). The optimal phases obtained using 10-point datasets showed high correlation with the 20-point BH&#8201;+&#8201;ECG datasets (R2&#8201;=&#8201;0.92 to 0.99, n&#8201;=&#8201;21); although the within-subject coefficient of variation (wsCV) was larger using 10-point fitting. The variation of repeated measurements was largest with FB acquisition and smallest with BH&#8201;+&#8201;ECG acquisition. The optimal frequency obtained by offline calculation and by real-time feedback calibration significantly reduced dark-band artifacts in cine bSSFP images (both p&#8201;&lt;&#8201;.01).
Conclusions:
The proposed real-time feedback calibration method for bSSFP imaging is rapid and fully automatic. This method could greatly reduce dark-band artifacts in bSSFP images and facilitate clinical CMR at 3.0&#160;T.</description>
        <link>http://jcmr-online.com/content/15/1/32</link>
                <dc:creator>Yu-Wei Tang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Teng-Yi Huang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wen-Chau Wu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2013, null:32</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2013-04-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1532-429X-15-32</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1532-429X-15-32-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1532-429X</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>32</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2013-04-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
